The Role of Context in ASL Signing and Sign Choices
In regard to American Sign Language (ASL), the concept of context plays an
especially important role in shaping communication strategies, sign selection,
and the overall clarity of the message being conveyed. Context in ASL can be
broadly categorized into two types: high-context signing and low-context
signing. Each of these categories employs distinct strategies and sign choices
that reflect the amount of shared knowledge, familiarity, and situational cues
available to both the signer and the viewer.
High-Context Signing:
High-context signing occurs in environments where the signer and the viewer
share a significant amount of background information, cultural understanding, or
situational awareness about the topics being discussed. This shared context
allows for a more efficient and nuanced mode of communication, where certain
assumptions can be made safely, and explicitness can be minimized without
sacrificing clarity.
In high-context situations, signers may opt for strategies that rely heavily on
the use of classifiers, indexing (pointing to establish or refer to referents,
subjects, and objects), use of referent possessives (aiming the palm of a
flat-hand toward a referent that possesses a thing or attribute), and the
employment of more abstract or conceptual signs rather than concrete or directly
translated ones. The use of non-initialized signs over initialized versions is
common, as it leans towards ASL's native linguistic structures rather than those
borrowed from English. Additionally, signers might use less mouthing and fewer
signs overall, relying instead on the context and non-manual signals (such as
facial expressions and body language) to convey their message. This approach
enables a rich, layered communication that is deeply embedded in the shared
experiences and understandings between the participants.
Low-Context Signing
Conversely, low-context signing is characteristic of situations where there is
little shared background, cultural knowledge, or familiarity between the signer
and the viewer. This lack of common understanding necessitates a more explicit
and detailed mode of communication to ensure that the message is conveyed
accurately and comprehensively.
In low-context scenarios, signers are likely to employ a greater number of
signs, including those with initialized elements, to ensure clarity and aid in
the translation of concepts not readily inferable from the situation alone.
Mouthing, often mirroring English words, becomes more pronounced, serving as an
additional cue to aid understanding. Signers may also resort to visual aids,
explicit establishment of context, and frequent reiteration of key points to
build the necessary framework for comprehension. The goal in low-context signing
is to minimize ambiguity and ensure that the viewer can fully grasp the message
without relying on unshared background knowledge.
Sign Choices and Communication Strategies
The choice between high-context and low-context signing strategies is not merely
a matter of preference but a reflection of the communication needs and
situational demands. Signers adeptly switch between these modes, tailoring their
sign choices to the audience's familiarity with the subject matter and the
context in which the interaction occurs. This flexibility allows ASL users to
navigate a wide range of communication environments effectively, from intimate,
culturally rich conversations within the Deaf community to more formal or
instructional settings where clear and detailed explanations are paramount.
Understanding the role of context in ASL not only enhances one's ability to
communicate effectively across different settings but also deepens appreciation
for the language's richness and adaptability. By considering the level of shared
knowledge and situational cues, signers can make informed choices that enhance
understanding, connection, and the conveyance of meaning in every interaction.
Notes:
█
Also see: Context