A discussion.
After watching the the video here: https://youtu.be/4F6rgC1-8rQ
... A YouTube viewer comments:
"I have been signing for 16 years and got my degree in ASL Interpreting. How is it that I am today-years-old that I learned that 1-5 tend to be palm backwards!!"
Tut, tut, be specific or you will confuse the newbies.
Finish your sentence: "1 - 5 tend to be palm backwards -- when done in isolation."
The tendency toward doing 1 through 5 with the palm facing backward has to do with proprioception.
You all are so busy trying to make your signing "clear" (thank you by the way) that you are causing yourself repetitive motion injuries.
It certainly isn't "wrong" (unless you have the unfortunate experience of taking ASL from an overly prescriptive, anal-retentive teacher).
Signing 1 thru 5 palm out (when not needed) adds just a teeny, tiny, itsy-bitsy, bit of unnecessary stress that foretells eventually you'll be taking ibuprofen, slathering on Aspercreme, and wearing a wrist brace to your (post-Covid-19) local interpreter get-togethers.
Question:
A YouTube commenter writes:
"I'm confused. Why would concern over tension in the hand be such a factor for numbers in isolation and not when the numbers are with other numbers? When they are not in isolation is exactly when your hands need a release from tension the most (but
they don't get it)? I always thought the point of the tendency towards palm backwards for numbers in isolation is because when a number is in isolation, it is the most vulnerable to being mistaken for a letter because it may very well then be placed
next to a letter with no other number around to make it clear what's really going on. This makes the difference between "2-D" and "venereal disease." Is the palm-backwards thing really more about hand tension than meaning?"
Response from Dr. Bill:
I didn't say tension was not a factor when the numbers (1 thru 5) are with other numbers (and thus typically done palm forward as part of a strong). When doing a string of numbers there is actually less tension and work overall by keeping the palm
pointing in the same direction throughout the string rather than to be switching back and forth. The palm likely defaults to "forward" for strings of characters likely due to the fact that letters are mostly palm forward and the sign for "hundred" is
palm forward.
If you are signing "74" and you are "already" pointing your hand forward to do a 7 it wouldn't make much sense to waste effort turning the hand backwards to do the 4.
The numbers 6 and 9 two of the (what you called) "vulnerable" (to misinterpretation) numbers both stay forward and tend to deal with their vulnerability (heh) by using a "tap" if needed
(if done in isolation not in a string). Which is to say they don't use a palm back position to
differentiate them from W and F.
I stand by my assertion that the palm-back thing is indeed more about "less effort" than from differentiating a 2 from a V.
That which typically distinguishes 2-D from V-D is not the handshape -- it is the context (and in some cases an added mouth morpheme).
I will go so far as to state that the principle of "palm back" (for 1 - 5) when in isolation AND "palm forward when doing a string of characters" even applies to "2D." Which is to say that the (cough) right (cough)* way to sign "2D" is to have the "2"
palm forward because it is part of the string "2" and "D" and thus takes less effort if done palm forward as part of the "string" (even though the string is only two characters long). For a real life example of this see the one minute and fifteen
second mark of this video: https://youtu.be/1M40DOru15Y?t=72
Notice the signer (who is obviously very skilled and is presenting on a Deaf / ASL-related channel) is choosing to do the opposite of what you are suggesting.
The likelihood that any skilled ASL signer is going to misunderstand the person in that video and assume that the person just randomly decided to start talking about venereal disease while discussing design formats is near zero.
Context and ease of signing triumph for skilled signers.
Comment from Darla:
I am C.O.D.A. and I teach Sign Language classes at my local V.F.W. I should
say I volunteer my time. Love it!
I always thought numbers 1-5 palm is facing the person. I never seen it the
way you are showing [palm back].
Maybe becuz of different state I'm from Iowa. Thanks for ur time
Response from Dr. Bill:
Hello Darla!
Numbers 1 - 5 are certainly done both ways in the Deaf community. For
isolated numbers 1 through 5 (meaning, when the number is done alone -- not
in a series) the citation (the basic or dictionary) version is palm back and
the inflected version is palm forward. By inflected I'm referring to the
very, very tiny bit more effort to do the number palm forward (a micro bit
more tension in the wrist). Since that inflection takes a micro bit more
effort to do it begs the question: What is the linguistic purpose of doing
the isolated numbers 1-5 forward?
Often there is no linguistic purpose or additional meaning -- it is just how
the person learned and now it is how their subconscious assumes it is done
and being done by others.
However sometimes the palm forward version of isolated numbers 1-5 is used
for emphasis and/or clarity.
There is no doubt that we see the palm-forward version when used in
combination with other numbers and/or signs such as "o'clock" or ages.
What I'm showing on the video however is what I consider to be the most
relaxed, common version when those numbers (1 - 5) are shown in isolation. I
encourage you to tune your "signing radar" for casual situations where
people are just "chatting" with each other and not standing in front of a
camera teaching or engaged in some other artificially formal situation.
Chances are you will start noticing the palm-back version showing up rather
often.
Notes:
* Can you tell I dislike the term "right" when discussing signing choices?
Notes: